|
Imperious
|
read my profile
sign my guestbook
Name: Robby Location: Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States Birthday: 2/14/1985 Gender: Male
Interests: Reading, writing, music, hanging out, movies, and, well, doing the things 20-year-olds do. Expertise: International Affairs with a concentration in Europe. I also know a thing or two about literature. Occupation: Student
Message: message me Website: visit my website AIM: theimperious
Member Since:
5/10/2003
|
|
|
These keys... I used
to play them. These keys- they were my
ivories of word.
It is a sensuous pleasure, mixing both the act of creation
and power of ownership. The twenty-six
clicks and ticks the only music I desire, hinting at the opus buried deep within; they mimic the call of sirens: beautiful, terrible and naked they lie before me. Sliding my eager fingers across the board, I
hold back to savor every second, my hands tingling in delicious anticipation. I feel their energy before I touch, a spark that whispers of deeper, orgiastic pleasures. Click
click. I take a breath and mouth the
first words, rolling them over my tongue, tasting them, salivating at the
texture of pure, raw word. I smile, and eagerly complete yet another blog. | | |
| "U.S. Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama came under fire on Friday for saying small-town Pennsylvania residents were "bitter" and "cling to guns or religion." I can see why this would be so frustrating to Barack Obama- to meet people who won't surrender their political freedoms and religious beliefs when the articulate black man comes to town. Clearly it is a sign of racism or small mindedness (or both). Good thing Obama was with a crowd that was eager to bow down and worship his greatness- he was, after all, in San Francisco. | | |
| How does an atheist value human life? This is a question that has perplexed me, both as a believer and, long ago, as an atheist. I am here defining human life to be the life that inhabits our mortal bodies, our "biological life."
It seems to me that an atheist manages to both diminsh the objective value of life and to exaggerate its comparative value. What I mean to say is that an atheist becomes more obsessed with the benefits of biological life (ie, physical pleasures, money, etc.) while diminishing the very value of that life.
A metaphor might better illustrate this point:
Imagine a small village, half of this village works as farmers and the other half works collecting water. The group of farmers then decides that they no longer "believe" in water and declare the only things worth producing are their crops. They have assigned all of their value to those crops, which now encompass their entire world. But without water for irrigation, those crops will wither and never grow to their full potential. They have made their crops their world, but have denied those crops the water needed to grow and be fruitful.
I think that the atheist is much like this. The deny the spiritual aspect of humanity and make the biological the total sum. Believers, however, think that humanity is composed of two parts: the spiritual and the biological. They believe that the combined value of those two parts is far greater than simply the biological. In fact, it is the spiritual that elevates the biological.
Our Earthly existence and bodies are all the more important and valuable because they are also temples for a drop of the divine. That tiny drop of divinity, of spiritual essence, is what allows us to rise above simple animals to become something altogether different and amazing. However, since we accept the existence of something beyond our mortal bodies, we know that our biological life is not the total sum. Though we know that our biological being is so much more than simply a sack of electric connectors and chemical receivers, we also know that it is but an atom within a drop of the sea that is God.
This is why religious people, despite believing that there is life after death and that biological life is just a grain of sand in our existence, are so passionately pro-life and why atheists are so easily pro-choice. We value that life so much higher, since we know it is touched by the divine, while an atheist would believe that they are simply ending a series of chemical reactions.
| | |
| I read Mere Christianity today cover to cover. It was my first read through, but I doubt it will be my last. I would like to dive into the meat of it on this post, but I would rather do that later.
Mere Christianity inspired me to look for more books on religion and to expand my knowledge of Jesus and the theology of Christianity. My first stop in browsing for more religious books? The religious and spiritual section on Amazon. I expected enlightened books on religion and the universal search for divinity in our world. What did I find? Most of everything I came across fit into two categories: The first belongs to the "Jesus wants you to be rich!" category and the latter and more offensive category was dedicated the abolition and debunking of religion.
This is when it really sank in that today, as far as I know, there is no C.S. Lewis. Where are the articulate and fearless defenders of our faith? There are many who stand and scream as "Christians," but where are the spokesmen who use logic and reason to engage the arguments of non Christians?
Though I am no liberal, I am frightened that the face of Christianity has become mixed with the faces of television preachers and the voice of the Teacher is confused amongst the screams of condemnation blasted from the "agents of intolerance."
But that aside, if anyone has any recommendations, please send them to me.
| | |
| So my latest entry has brought on a great deal of criticism in defense of Saint Obama, who, as well all know, walks on water and can do no wrong.
Here is one of my responses:
(This one was to Kory, whose comment I deleted dictatorially and with great aplomb)
I could not have disagreed with what you said to a greater degree. I
think Obama is a political opportunist and the supreme benefactor of a
movement, not the kind of selfless martyr or messianic figure he is
portrayed as. He takes absolutely no positions that are politically
difficult for him, just ambiguous bumper sticker positions. His
legislative achievements are non-existent (again because he lacks true
leadership ability to take a stance on difficult issues.) Asked in the
last democratic debate about his achievements in the Senate, he took
credit for McCains immigration bill on the basis that he voted for it-
is that true leadership? Taking credit for someone else's bill- someone
who actually took an unpopular position among his constituency. What did Obama risk by quietly voting for a bill his
party lukewarmly supports? Nothing- he is a candidate of political expediency.
Also,
the idea that being elected to a state legislature is in any way the
equivalent to the experience of a governor or long-term leader on the
national stage is flat out ludicrous. I deleted your comment because
that was so far from any realm of sense or logic that I could not
muster up the energy to explain why someone who manages a Gamestop
shouldn't go straight to becoming the CEO of EA Games.
I do
not want to get the pendulum swinging towards socialism in this
country. You may believe that Christianity is not compatible with
Capitalism, but I do not think it is compatible with Secular Socialism
either. I do not want the 10% unemployment rates of Germany and France or
the disastrous medical system of the United Kingdom and Canada.
I
started to respond to your comment, and then thought that I simply
did not want to- and I also did not want to leave a long, aggressive and
ridiculous response on my journal, so I deleted it.
| | |
|